LINQ To SQL Changes in Visual Studio 2010
Damien Guard was nice enough to blog about changes coming to L2S in VS 2010. Rather, the changes are coming in the .NET Framework 4.0. The whole rumour within the development community/blogs about “LINQ To SQL is being unsupported, Entity Framework is the new coolness” was just plain wrong, I believe. Microsoft is too big, and has too many projects on the go. They’ll gauge the momentum of both technologies. Have you heard Damien as a guest on Herding Code Episode 50? In this blog post, Damien says that the focus for Microsoft will be on EF, and that’s fine. L2S is definitely not dead! I still believe that if you’re needing an ORM, and working with SQL Server, then use LINQ To SQL. I’ve tried EF, and it worked fine. I’ve ended up with 4 projects using L2S, and haven’t found any real need for EF.
Welcome Defect Fixes in coming in .NET 4.0 for Linq-To-Sql
For me, the most interesting changes within Damien’s post are:
Contains()with enums automatically casts to int or string depending on column type**
Contains()now correctly handles
~in the search string (regular & compiled queries) - Here’s a small defect. I’ve not needed to search for tildes very much, but I decided to give it a shot just in case! It’s true, the behavior is just as described!
Now detects multiple active result sets (MARS) better - I am not the heaviest user of L2S, and definitely haven’t needed to specify MARS myself. Here’s the MultipleActiveResultSets defect as reported on MS Connect. It’s a simple issue where the connection string property
MultipleActiveResultSets is only picked up when CamelCased exactly as shown above. Any deviation will ignore the option!
DeleteDatabase no longer fails with case-sensitive database servers - Interesting that this functionality even exists. I had to research this method -
DataContext.DeleteDatabase(). I can’t recall actually seeing it in the IntelliSense method list, but indeed it’s there! Most blogpost or articles that I read in that 5 minute span were talking about using this method for tear-down during “Unit Testing”. I’d call that integration testing, and ill-informed as well. Unit tests should not include databases!
varchar(1) now correctly maps to string and not char - This one has bitten me before. The column was called Gender. Of course it was storing M, F, T, or U for unknown. The core of the problem was that some rows were having a blank stored in this field, rather than null. StackOverflow to the rescue! http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1190328/linq-to-sql-exception-string-must-be-exactly-one-character-long. After some thought, I’d agree that storing this value as
char(1) would be semantically more correct, more performant, and consume just one byte per tuple.
Decimal precision and scale are now emitted correctly in the DbType attributes for stored procedures & computed columns - I couldn’t reproduce this defect, and perhaps I misunderstood. I defined a
decimal(18,5) attribute on the table, and L2S brought it back without any problems. Then I realized the key to this defect was probably the ‘computed’ bit. So I went and created a simple decimal return type. I ran the query, and still no defect.
Then I clued in - the defect was under the LINQ To SQL Designer heading. So upon further inspection, here’s the defect in the
myL2S.designer.cs. The return type is calculated as
decimal(0,0). Ouch! :)
Foreign key changes will be picked up when bringing tables back into the designer without a restart - This defect has hit me a few times as well. It appears as such:
- Edit a FK in SQL Server. If you’ve got an open L2S file, deleting + dragging and dropping those tables back onto the L2S surface DO NOT show your FK changes.
- Clicking the Refresh button in Server Explorer doesn’t help.
- The only solution is to close your L2S file, and re-open.
Changing a FK for a table and re-dragging it to the designer surface will show new FK’s - this is very much related to the item above.
Opening a DBML file no longer causes it to be checked out of source control - this has appeared to me a few times. Simply opening/viewing the L2S file creates a ‘check out’. Nothing earth shattering here, and glad to see this is fixed.
Can edit the return value type of unidentified stored procedure types - This feature is great! It’s very helpful when you’ve got a sproc that shapes data just the exact perfect way that you’d like to show on a custom report. Perhaps you’re binding to an
asp:GridView or including as part of an MVC FormViewModel. The normal course of action is:
- Create your proc to shape your data as you like
- Drag a proc onto the Methods section of the L2S designer.
- Try change its return type to a class you’ve created solely for the purpose of binding
- Oops, it’s locked!
The work-around is a bit time-consuming. You have to:
- open up the
- find your method marked with the attribute containing your proc name
- replace the default return type
ISingleResult<t>- in my simple example here, it’s
The frustrating bit here is that this behavior isn’t predictable (to me at least). I CONSTANTLY have to go through this process to properly set the return type of 2 procs in one particular project. This defect fix in particular by Microsoft will be welcome!